1967 v. 2006
Posted 12 years ago by
Adam Gautsch
1967
2006
4 Comments
olivier blanchard ~
12 years ago
The chip stacking is kind of slack though.
... Although Carl Jung might interpret it differently.
Adam Gautsch ~
12 years ago
RE: Olivier's Comment:
The poker was the most unbelievable part of the entire movie.
-----------------POSSIBLE SPOILER---------------
Final hand- flush loses to full house loses to bigger full house loses to straight flush. That happens.
Evan Tishuk ~
12 years ago
Yeah, I thought they could have done a more believable job on the central pillar of the movie. The poker was disrespectfully awful.
Lovingly crafted by orangecoat with some rights reserved, and a promise not to spam you.
Back to top
Err.. I say the 1967 movie could only be done in 1967 but I think I'm lying. The more I look at it the more 'Web 2.0-y' it looks.